Save electricity; Start investing in LED lightning!

Save electricity; Start investing in LED lightning!

Save 90% on electricity with our Genii LED bulbs.

Save 85% on electricity with our Genii replacements on Conventional Halogen lightning.

Save 50% on electricity with our Genii replacements on Conventional Fluorescent lightning.

AND ALL THE MENTIONED ABOVE FOR MANY MORE HOURS!!!!!



Contact us at geniieu@gmail.com

Advantages

   * Efficiency: LEDs emit more light per watt than incandescent light bulbs. Their efficiency is not affected by shape and size, unlike fluorescent light bulbs or tubes.
   * Color: LEDs can emit light of an intended color without using any color filters as traditional lighting methods need. This is more efficient and can lower initial costs.
   * Size: LEDs can be very small (smaller than 2 mm2) and are easily populated onto printed circuit boards.
   * On/Off time: LEDs light up very quickly. A typical red indicator LED will achieve full brightness in under a microsecond. LEDs used in communications devices can have even faster response times.
   * Cycling: LEDs are ideal for uses subject to frequent on-off cycling, unlike fluorescent lamps that fail faster when cycled often, or HID lamps that require a long time before restarting.
   * Dimming: LEDs can very easily be dimmed either by pulse-width modulation or lowering the forward current.
   * Cool light: In contrast to most light sources, LEDs radiate very little heat in the form of IR that can cause damage to sensitive objects or fabrics. Wasted energy is dispersed as heat through the base of the LED.
   * Slow failure: LEDs mostly fail by dimming over time, rather than the abrupt failure of incandescent bulbs.
   * Lifetime: LEDs can have a relatively long useful life. One report estimates 35,000 to 50,000 hours of useful life, though time to complete failure may be longer. Fluorescent tubes typically are rated at about 10,000 to 15,000 hours, depending  
      partly on the conditions of use, and incandescent light bulbs at 1,000–2,000 hours.
   * Shock resistance: LEDs, being solid state components, are difficult to damage with external shock, unlike fluorescent and incandescent bulbs which are fragile.
   * Focus: The solid package of the LED can be designed to focus its light. Incandescent and fluorescent sources often require an external reflector to collect light and direct it in a usable manner.
   * Low toxicity: LEDs do not contain mercury, unlike fluorescent lamps. However, LEDs may contain other hazardous metals such as lead and arsenic.

Disadvantages

   * Fluorescent lamps are typically more efficient than LEDs (for lamps with the same CRI).
   * High initial price: LEDs are currently more expensive, price per lumen, on an initial capital cost basis, than most conventional lighting technologies. The additional expense partially stems from the relatively low lumen output and the drive circuitry
      and power supplies needed.
   * Temperature dependence: LED performance largely depends on the ambient temperature of the operating environment. Over-driving an LED in high ambient temperatures may result in overheating the LED package, eventually leading to device
      failure. Adequate heat sinking is needed to maintain long life. This is especially important in automotive, medical, and military uses where devices must operate over a wide range of temperatures, and need low failure rates.
   * Voltage sensitivity: LEDs must be supplied with the voltage above the threshold and a current below the rating. This can involve series resistors or current-regulated power supplies.
   * Light quality: Most cool-white LEDs have spectra that differ significantly from a black body radiator like the sun or an incandescent light. The spike at 460 nm and dip at 500 nm can cause the color of objects to be perceived differently under
      cool-white LED illumination than sunlight or incandescent sources, due to metamerism,[89] red surfaces being rendered particularly badly by typical phosphor based cool-white LEDs. However, the color rendering properties of common fluorescent 
      lamps are often inferior to what is now available in state-of-art white LEDs.
   * Area light source: LEDs do not approximate a “point source” of light, but rather a lambertian distribution. So LEDs are difficult to apply to uses needing a spherical light field. LEDs cannot provide divergence below a few degrees. In contrast, lasers
      can emit beams with divergences of 0.2 degrees or less.
   * Blue hazard: There is a concern that blue LEDs and cool-white LEDs are now capable of exceeding safe limits of the so-called blue-light hazard as defined in eye safety specifications such as ANSI/IESNA RP-27.1–05: Recommended Practice for
      Photobiological Safety for Lamp and Lamp Systems.
   * Electrical Polarity: Unlike incandescent light bulbs, which illuminate regardless of the electrical polarity, LEDs will only light with correct electrical polarity.
   * Blue pollution: Because cool-white LEDs (i.e., LEDs with high color temperature) emit proportionally more blue light than conventional outdoor light sources such as high-pressure sodium vapor lamps, the strong wavelength dependence of
      Rayleigh scattering means that cool-white LEDs can cause more light pollution than other light sources. The International Dark-Sky Association discourages using white light sources with correlated color temperature above 3,000 K.
   * Droop: The efficiency of LEDs tends to decrease as one increases current.